I recant all the gushing I made last year when I said, "3D is God's gift to film":
(http://cinemanista.blogspot.com/2010/08/why-i-love-3d.html )3D is cool when used with the right film (Tron: Legacy and Sanctum are the very best 3D movies I've seen so far) but for the most part, 3D has become annoying because it isn't exclusive anymore- it's everywhere!
Too many films are being done in 3D- too many movies that have no business using 3D- ahem, the recently released A Very Harold & Kumar 3D Christmas.
Contagion, the apocalyptic-esque movie about a world wide virus, is another film this year where you have to wonder, why was-this-made-in-3D?!? What really needed an emphasis to pop out? Germs?!?
I saw it however in the alternative 2D, and it was fine, more than fine. I know if I would have saw it in 3D, I would have regretted paying close to twenty dollars to pointlessly wear 2 pair of glasses (I wear glasses when screen watching.).
I see now why top critic Roger Ebert says he hates 3D and moviegoers should too:
( http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2010/04/30/why-i-hate-3-d-and-you-should-too.html )
But I don't necessarily hate it.
I just think movies with these elements work the most effective for 3D:
-water
-flying
- fast driving
-battles/fights
-dancing
And that these genres are the best for 3D:
-children's (Pixar, Disney)
-action
-superhero
-artsy/experimental
-horror/thriller
Comedies especially, romance and dramas- and 3D should not really mix.
Can you imagine the comedy Jack and Jill in 3D?
Or the biopic J Edgar?
Or the upcoming romantic comedy New Year's Eve?
What would be the point?
2012 will be jam packed with big name films in 3D:
-Titanic
-Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance
-Men in Black III
-Underworld 4
-The Texas Chainsaw Massacre
-Halloween
-The Great Gatsby
I'm more excited that (most of) these movies are coming out, not that they'll be in 3D.
Sorry 3D, you can be cool but I'll take a good old 2D movie any day!
***
No comments:
Post a Comment